England 1 - 1 France: It'll Do

Overall, let me say that I am totally happy with a point against France. Before the game I would have taken a draw, and after it I was content to have done so. Nor do I believe the idea (as posited by the charming Patrice Evra) that England should have been embarrassed by the way they played, or that, in his words, England did to France what Chelsea did to Barcelona. Bullshit. We were defensive, yes, but it wasn't the anti-football that Chelsea played in Europe this season.


In the first twenty or so minutes against France, we had a lot of reasons to be cheerful. Milner had burst through on goal only to shank horribly wide from the acute angle, Oxlade-Chamberlain had pressed well and the attacking impetus was with England. This more or less ended with our goal (a well-taken cushioned header is always nice to see). From that point on we were on the back foot, but we still looked threatening when we had the ball on the break.


Quite quickly, Nasri equalised (his celebration to the 'French media' showing that he is not in any way self-obsessed). From then on, how much did France really create? Hart dealt with a decent Diarra header from a corner with an excellent reflex save, and the rest were shots from outside the box. The line being peddled (again, largely by Evra-types) that we were lucky to survive is nonsense.


That said, we did allow them to dominate possession in a way that made everybody quite uncomfortable. From my position, what seemed largely to be the problem was the gap between Scott Parker and the defence- there wasn't one. He is supposed to be the line of defence after the midfield, not a third centre back. As Nasri et al had more and more possession outside our box, the defence dropped deeper and deeper, and Parker got sucked in with them. What should have happened is that the defence should have kept a slightly higher line, trusting in their ability to intercept through balls through the packed box, and Parker should have stayed higher up, pressuring the person with the ball, rather than dropping to allow them time and space to shoot. The problem, one suspects, is that he is afraid of getting beaten, and decides to take the seemingly safer option. Of course, he should trust in his own ability to make challenges or at least not allow the attacking player time to make a decision.


It seems strange to criticise Parker, who I actually thought played an important role in breaking up their attacks before they could really start, which of course is his job. But it was notable how many times he seemed to be playing alongside the defence, rather than ahead of them.


Overall, it's fair to say that we ceded possession to the technically superior French, and it paid off. They couldn't break us down. If we had had Rooney, Wilshere, and, erm... our other technically gifted midfielders/forwards, I might be annoyed at the way we had played. But we don't, and we won't have a technically talented team for many years, if ever. So Hodgson, rightly, is making do with what we do have, and I have to say I'm more than happy to see it.


What will be interesting is how we line up, and how we take on the matches against Ukraine and Sweden. Unlike France, they are not replete with gifted players, and are certainly seen as slightly more beatable. It will be up to Hodgson whether we stick with the difficult to break down side that we have seen against Norway, Belgium, and France, or if we twist with an adventurous outlook. We can't change the line-up that much (look at our bench on Monday for an example of why), but we can go out with a slightly more positive outlook. Whether we will, remains to be seen, and whether we should is worthy of debate.

England 1-0 Belgium

Although that was a pretty unininspiring game, I was really happy with the way England set up and played. We were up against a much more creative and, probably, better team. Yet we looked solid, didn't concede too many chances, and took ours well when it came. It doesn't make for thrilling viewing, but it does make for points in group stage games.77

Players that stood out for me were... erm. Creative expression and displays of skill were thin on the ground to say the least. Ashley Young coped pretty well with a slightly more playmaker-y role, incuding the great ball through to Welbeck for the goal that won the game. Welbeck took the goal very well indeed. Will he start ahead of Carroll? You'd think not, as Carroll provides more of the English 'rough-and-tumble' up front (read- he uses his elbows more), but I know who I'd rather have on the pitch in the event of a one on one. Defoe and Walcott both did well when they came on. I wonder if Walcott will start either. He's certainly a useful player to have on the bench, but I suppose a lot of it will depend on the formation. 4-5-1, you'd expect him to start.

The game itself doesn't bear much analysis, but the result will stand England in good stead going into the group games. Of course, the Cahill thing was annoying. If one Chelsea centre half had to miss the tournament, why oh why couldn't it be Captain Bionic? Cahill will no doubt be incensed that the injury came about so needlessly, and unsportingly. I, on the other hand, am incensed that a certain gurning, trophy-stealing, alleged-racist ex-captain couldn't have been the one to take the fall.

Now, of course, Martin Kelly has been drafted in to fill the gap. He won't play (please God), and as I mentioned previously, there is still decent depth at centre back. Terry and Lescott will be no worse as a partnership than Terry and Cahill would have been. At current rates,we will lose at least two more key players before our first game a week today, so maybe we should have a couple of days of training with those soft sponge balls, and helmets.


I don't think we learnt much from Belgium that we didn't already know. We are a technically limited team, but if we can retain that solid shape that sucks a lot of the fun out of the game but makes defending a lot easier, we will remain hard to beat. Hopefully that will be enough to see us through the group stage.


I'll be back over the weekend after watching the first couple of matches, and in time for a preview of England-France. Until then.

Last but not least

Finally, we arrive at the strikers. I’d imagine it’s not going to make for pretty reading, so close your eyes if that makes it easier.

Andy Carroll

Had a shocker of a season really, despite his much-discussed upturn in form towards the end. Probably that late boost (which still was nothing that special) sealed his inclusion. Problematically, he might well be starting our first two games. I say problematically because, whilst I don’t think he’s necessarily a bad player, England will very much revert to the long-ball game that seems to come quite naturally to them if he is on the pitch. Sadly, he doesn’t have the talent that that style needs- the ability to hold up the ball intelligently and then lay it off when the midfield or wingers arrive. Nor does he really have the touch or presence to perform the ‘battering-ram’ role. In essence, he’s a big man, but not the right man for the big-man role.

Danny Welbeck

Scored a fair few goals for United this season and certainly showed glimpses of being excellent. Like most young players he hasn’t been a consistent threat, but I suppose tournament football doesn’t call so much for consistency. He also will be less-known to our opponents than most of the old guard, which can only be an advantage. I personally would have taken him over Sturridge, if only for the obvious reason that Sturridge plays for Chelsea.

Jermain Defoe

Scored 11 goals this season without playing that consistently for Tottenham, which is a decent return. For a reason I can’t quite explain, I really dislike him, but his goalscoring record throughout his career has been very good and he certainly deserves to be in the squad. What role will he play, though? Assuming (and nobody’s sure), that Hodgson will play a 4-4-2 in the first two games, you sense that Carroll and Wellbeck will start. Alternatively, if it’s a 4-3-3/4-5-1 type thing, then that ‘1’ will most likely be given to Carroll as the aforementioned ‘big man’. Personally, I’d rather see a proven goalscorer get a bit more game time but I predict he’ll be seeing a lot of the bench.

Wayne Rooney

How costly does that stupid kick against Montenegro seem now? For one moment in which he lost his head, Rooney could come back into the team after they’re already out of the Euros. The worst case scenario, of course, is that England lose their first two games, and Rooney is forced to play a humiliating 90-minute consolation match against Ukraine. Putting  a less bleak spin on it, however, picture this: we scrape a draw with France and beat Sweden, then welcome Rooney back into a team now filled with confidence. We dispatch Ukraine and progress to the next round with a rested, hungry Rooney ready to do some serious damage. It could happen. Of course, he would then get sent off in the quarter final, causing a media hate campaign that ends in a flaming Shrek-like effigy being hung from a Fleet Street office, but that’s by the by. Rooney is a very, very rare England player in that he is capable of making something from nothing, of winning games on his own. Our performance in the first two games will determine whether he gets the chance to do that at all.

So, there you have it. The ideal first eleven would be a match for all but two or three teams that we could face, but the odds of all eleven being able to start are so slim that we would do better, realistically, to consider ourselves in the third tier of teams. If the top three are Germany, Spain, and the Netherlands, and the next are Italy, France and Portugal, we’re probably a rung below that lot. That might be being pessimistic, it will become clearer after we watch the final round of friendlies. Still, with England, better to prepare for disappointment than to build up any semblance of hope!

I’ll be back on June the 3^rd to dissect England’s game with Belgium at Wembley. Until then.

Middling to Average

Day 3 of my ceaseless quest to enlighten you on the Euros, and it’s time to look at those making up England’s midfield. Compared to the depth of the defence, it’s pretty sparse:

Steven Gerrard

He, along with quite a few others, is part of that ‘Golden Generation’ which we heard so much about but still failed to ever progress past a quarter final. He certainly remains one of the biggest names in the squad, and will likely start every game, but he doesn’t fill me (or anyone) with confidence, because he has simply failed to deliver on the international stage so many times. Debate is ongoing at the moment about whether he is actually that good any more, and whilst I don’t think you could say he’s past it, he certainly has seemed more inclined to spray long balls around, rather than pick up the ball and drive forwards himself as we used to see. Whether he’s past his best or not, if we want to progress, we need him to be playing well.

Frank Lampard

Currently the situation regarding his thigh injury is unclear. Despite who he is, it would be a blow for England if he was declared unfit for the tournament (not least because Henderson would be his replacement). The consensus seems to be that he would sit deep alongside Scott Parker in a midfield 3, and to be fair he has been doing that fairly well of late. Of course, that would mean the ancient Lampard-Gerrard conundrum rears its boring head once again, but maybe the deployment of Fwank in a role further back would ease that. If he’s injured, we’re seriously light of options in the middle.

Scott Parker

A guaranteed starter. Parker has suddenly found himself an integral part of the England team despite not getting a look-in for years. I haven’t loved him at Tottenham (naturally); I often think that if he were not English he would be seen less as a ‘40s throw-back Battle of Britain fighter pilot type, and more of a Nigel de Jong thug type. His vision on the ball is about as limited as an Alan Shearer tactical analysis, but that’s OK because he doesn’t need to be the one playing the defence-splitting pass, he needs to be the one making sneaky fouls before midfielders can bring forwards into play. This is something he does well.

James Milner

Milner seems to have been around for ages (in fact, according to Wikipedia, he made his England debut in 2009). He is an asset in tournament football because of his versatility: he is alright if nothing special on either wing; alright if nothing special in an attacking position in the middle; alright if nothing special as an emergency full back. Useful guy to have around, but probably (injury to Lampard permitting) won’t start.

Stewart Downing

Meh. Downing has provided the only properly controversial decision of Hodgson’s reign so far: most people looked at his stats (zero league goals, zero league assists) and decreed that he is rubbish. Personally, I think that the assists thing is slightly off: he was largely feeding the ball to Andy Carroll, who spent the first 95% of the season doing his best impression of a donkey who has been kept down a year in school. If Downing had been assisting a more capable striker, his stats would have improved slightly. That aside, watching him play tells you more than statistics ever could: he is a bog-standard, unexciting winger, with a skill level typical of most of England’s second string. Meh. Meh. Meh.

Theo Walcott

Not everyone’s cup of tea, but I remain a fan. His return of 8 goals and 11 assists this season has been decent, if not remarkable, and he has that ability to finish instinctively, provided he doesn’t have any time to think about what he’s going to do. He will probably start, and if nothing else the knowledge of what his pace can do to teams will mean they can flood forward less freely. It is frustrating when he tackles himself, but he also poses a genuine threat and, without Rooney starting, we need all of those we can get.

Ashley Young

Young is one of those players who I never really thought anything of, until he moved to United and suddenly seemed incredibly dangerous even though he’s actually nothing that special (another example would be Valencia). Could start ahead of Downing, but then we will have two very fast wingers with arguable end product starting. To be fair to him, he’s scored in his last 4 England games so he must be doing something right, but I just don’t see him having a big impact. Call it a hunch.

Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain

Clearly there’s something to the Ox. He comes on against Norway and almost sets up a goal with his very first touch, in what was an otherwise dull game. He’s one of those rare players that every time he’s on the ball, there’s a certain expectation that he’s going to do something with it. For this reason, I hope he makes more than a few conciliatory cameos in this tournament. If we’re drawing with France, say, I’d love to see him come on with 70 minutes gone and really get a chance. Having said that, I am well aware that it is somewhat alarming that so much vague hope rests on his admittedly burly shoulders. I fully supported Wenger’s decision (he’ll be glad to hear) to use the Ox sparingly throughout this season. Look what a full season did to Jack Wilshere (how much brighter would the midfielders section look with him in it?) I hope that the pressure of a country that has only really seen him play a bit-part so far doesn’t affect him, when and if he gets a decent shot. I’d like to see more Michael Owen in ’98 than Theo Walcott in ’06.

So there you have it, the cream of English midfielders. If it looks a bit more like semi-skimmed, gone-off milk, then blame the FA. Or grass-roots football. Or Paul Scholes. The fact is , a starting 5 (for the first 2 games) of Walcott, Parker, Lampard, Gerrard, Young, is decent and arguably could progress from the group. The problem is that Lampard might be out, and substitutions will need to made. That’s where Downing, Milner, and maybe even Henderson(!) come in and start to make everything look a bit bland. Generally, it takes a whole squad to do well in these tournaments, and the midfield is somewhere where we’re likely to come up short.

Tomorrow I’ll return to consider the final piece in the jigsaw, the forwards. Until then.

                                         This beige square sums up my thoughts on Stewart Downing

Clean Sheets and Dirty Talk

OK, so today it’s the defenders that made the 23. With the injury to Barry and the call-up of Jagielka we are now taking 8 rather than 7, so let’s have a look:

Glen Johnson

Like most Liverpool players, he didn’t tear up any trees this season but he is experienced enough to do the job adequately. You worry about the game against France though- Johnson is not particularly disciplined in terms of keeping shape at the back, and he will be up against Ribery, who will be interlinking with Nasri and Benzema. If Walcott (or whoever) is pinning the opposition left-back back with pace, Johnson is an asset on the overlap. If we are the ones being pinned back, you sense his positional play will be a bit of a weakness.

Gary Cahill

The second starting centre half position will be between him and Lescott. He was an asset to Chelsea during their push for (or, more accurately, purchase of) the Champions League, and that kind of backs-to-the-wall defending will no doubt stand him in good stead if he is chosen to start. Still, he doesn’t fill me with that warm, safe, Tony Adams-type feeling that a real English centre-half should. Probably the Chelsea factor.

John Terry

Bleurgh. At least he’ll feel at home in ‘liberal’ Ukraine.

Joleon Lescott

Decent. The second centre half position is one where we have good options. I thought he was excellent for Man City pretty consistently (with the exception of that near-fatal header back to Cisse on the last day), and I will be happy if he starts, with Cahill on the bench.

Ashley Cole

If you can look past the loathability (and I can’t), he’s a very good left-back and one of the few players England have that would get into most other international teams.

Phil Jagielka

It shows the relative strength in depth we have at centre back that Jagielka is our fourth choice. He’s another decent if unspectacular player, and there’s no shame in that when it’s unlikely that he’ll play at all.

Leighton Baines

I don’t love him or hate him, but he’s a decent, solid left-back. I must admit I don’t watch Everton all that much, but I don’t recall any massive Baines howlers. I’m in the rare position of hoping Ashley Cole doesn’t get injured, but if he does, at least we have another qualified left-back (unlike at right-back). This will probably be Cole’s last tournament and so it will be good to get Baines some international experience so he can disappoint us next time around.

Phil Jones

Is more likely to be used in case of injury (or confidence-shattering mishap) to Glen Johnson than anywhere in the centre. This is worrying. The man with the rubber face   is not really a right-back at all. At Man. United he has been pinged from position to position like a Chelsea WAG and has suffered for it. Clearly a great prospect for the future but why take him as specific right-back cover? Ah yes. The lack of viable alternatives. That’s why.

So, there you have it. I think if there is any chance of us progressing out of the group, it will have to be down to an extremely tight defence, because I can’t see us setting the world alight with our attackers. Luckily, this is probably the strongest area of the squad. A starting back four of Johnson, Terry, Lescott, Cole, whilst not exactly Italy in 2006 , is experienced and looks good on paper. There is convincing back-up everywhere but at right-back. Let me remind you that Greece won Euro 2004 scoring only 7 goals. Spain won the World Cup scoring 8. In tournament football, clean sheets are everything, and I’m feeling surprisingly positive about the defence overall.

Back tomorrow when it all starts to go downhill as I take a look at the midfield.

My kingdom for increased squad depth

So, with the Euros heading our way faster than John Terry towards a trophy he has contributed nothing towards, it is the duty of your humble blogger to analyse the England  squad that Hodgson has finalised this morning. I’ll start off today with the goalkeepers, and work through the rest as the week goes on. I am only one man…

Goalkeepers:

Joe Hart

It is worrying to me that so much seems to depend on him staying fit. The thing is, he isn’t that amazing. I’m not saying he’s a bad goalkeeper, far from it. But his shot-stopping ability is far, far better than his handling of crosses (in terms of a truly safe goalkeeper, England have never replaced David Seaman). Hart is excellent, but his deficiencies under high balls have been masked by the fact that he had the Premier League’s stingiest defence ahead of him, including a rejuvenated Gael Clichy and Zabaleta as the left and right full backs. He wasn’t facing the barrage in the league that he will be at the Euros with the distinctly less-good Baines and Johnson occupying those positions. However, he does seem to reassure the defence that plays in front of him and one has the feeling that he is good enough to keep the number one for the foreseeable future. And his shot-stopping ability is actually excellent. Maybe I’m just being pessimistic.

Rob Green

He was decent against Norway at the weekend. The reaction to his admittedly ill-timed mistake against the USA two-years ago was typically hysterical and must have done wonderful things to his confidence. Again, he is a decent shot-stopper but less than sure under high balls from out wide. Come to think of it, that seems to be what separates the good goalies from the great. You can count the number of current goalkeepers that are actually confidence-inspiring when facing both shots and crosses on your fingers. Not a disastrous back-up goalkeeper to have, but isn’t exactly going to inspire fear in opposition strikers.

Jack Butland

Unsurprisingly, I have never seen this guy play, so I can’t comment on his ability. What I can comment on is the indictment his call-up is on the paucity of English goalkeeping talent. We have one goalkeeper who arguably would not look out of place in the really great teams. Rob Green is a decent deputy, as above. But the fact that the third choice goalkeeper is a 19-year old who has only ever played in League Two is, if you think about it, astonishing. And this is not to put him down, if he’s the third-best available then good luck to him, I’m sure he’ll go on to have a great career in the Premier League. But that’s in the future…

Let’s compare to some of the other teams going to the Euros. Spain will be taking along Casillas, Valdes and Reina (I assume). Three goalkeepers who would start for the best teams in England (and I include Reina in that, who I still think is in the Premier League’s top two goalkeepers. He’s their third choice.) OK, England are not at Spain’s level, and if we compare all of our players to their frankly ludicrous pool of talent we’ll be getting suicidal pretty quickly. What about France, who are probably just about at our level, at least defensively? Lloris, Mandanda and Carrasso. 2 excellent and one very good. And, you’ll notice, none of them have only ever played in the fourth division. Holland: Stekelenburg, Michel Vorm, Tim Krul. Russia: Akinfeev, Malafeev, and (er) Anton Shunin, who admittedly I do not know about but plays for Dinamo Moscow.

This has become a rant. The point I am essentially making is that we appear very limited in terms of indigenous goalkeeping talent at the moment. To be reduced to taking a 19-year old uncapped new kid, for the country that has produced Banks, Shilton and Seaman, seems quite sad.

In fact, why not give Seaman a quick call? He played the other day and looked just as good as the old days, until he was chipped by the lead guitarist off of Kasabian. But Seaman’s never been lobbed in an important game for England...

I’ll be back tomorrow with a look at the defenders. Three of whom play for Chelsea. Expect bile.

Tail, meet legs.

Err, sorry about that.

Firstly, the excuses for my three-month absence. Suffice to say, I was betrayed. After finally summoning up the courage to write about our end to the season (summary: phew) something terrible happened that made me consider whether I had any love left for football. Seeing that gurning clown prancing about in his shinpads, my mind turned to this blog. Could I really start it up again in the knowledge that football can bring that amount of pain? Where would I begin?

However, I have battled through, and due to an overwhelming surge in popular demand, I have dusted off the old laptop and am ready to spew my thoughts on football into the minds of my multitudinous readers.

'But Joe, the season's finished!' I hear you exclaim. Well, yes. But this year ends in an even number, so to fill the void that is normally filled by watching static for 2 hours at 3pm on a Saturday, we're going to have wondrous, fulfilling international football to feast upon. Well, 'feast upon' is a bit strong. 'Watch' would be more accurate.

I know, I know, it's passé to like international football. It's out of fashion to drink beer, take your top off, paint a red cross on your face and cheer on Ing-er-land to a heroic group-stage exit. But I'm going to anyway, because I bloody love it, and you should too. Enjoy the way that big players consistently fail to turn up at major tournaments. Embrace the inevitable controversy surrounding racist Ukrainian fans. Take pleasure in the way that in England's draw with Sweden, most of the actual viewing will be of stunning blonde girls in the crowd who catch the eye of pervy cameramen. Yes, the football will be of a much lower standard. Much, much lower, if you're supporting England. But that doesn't mean you can't enjoy it, and I'm going to.

With that in mind, I have set aside the weeks between June the 8th and July the 1st for a veritable buffet of football. And, if you've forgiven my 3-month absence from the blogging world (are people still saying 'blogosphere'?) you'll be able to read my collected ramblings on the progress of England, as well as the other games I watch, and a variety of various other Euro and Arsenal related things.

Don't let the presence of John Terry spoil it for you. If you're English, support England and, you never know, we might just pull off a Greece. If you're from a non-European country (and a warm hello to my few regular readers in Taiwan and Kazakhstan), may I recommend Spain or Germany, they're likely to bring you the most joy.

So, it's good to be back. I'll return later this week after Hodgson's confirmation of the final 23 on Tuesday. See you then.

                                                                      Even the Swedes are jealous...